Farms: Evolution of farm buildings from 1900 to today

Productivity | Information | History | View | Quality

1. 1. How well did video directly address assigned technical content?
   Is a interesting video of evolutions of farm buildings and content meny interestings data of this issue
   2. How well did the video communicate message (audio/image quality, rhythm and language/vocabulary)?
   The speaker has a good pronunciation and they do it with many photos that facilitate the compression
   3. Was the video creative? 
   Is a classic video where you can watch a good explanation of this issue
   4. Suggestions for improvement (Think about using words you would like to see if you were receiving feedback).
   The speaker do it many stops in the video and it would be better if they include video not only photos. 
2. Thank you very much for your advice. 
   We are pleased that the video has been deemed clear and rich in content. 
   Unfortunately, with such an argument has not been possible to make it very lively and witty this video.
3. 1. How well did video directly address assigned technical content?
   The video has lots of information including historical data and floorplans.
   2. How well did the video communicate message ?
   The video is clear, then you can easily understand.
   It contains detailed information.
   The voice doesn’t have any problems and is easy to understand.
   But I think the beat is too slow.
   3. Was the video creative? 
   The video is not creative, but it is not necessary to explain this topic.
   4. Suggestions for improvement 
   One way to improve the video would be increasing the speed and the voice shouldn’t have many pauses
   Perhaps you could include more photos.
4. 1.How well did video directly address assigned technical content? 
   
   From my point of view the viedo addresses the content in a good way. A clear structure is followed and is eassy to get the content.
   
   2.How well did the video comunicate the message?
   
   I think that the video comunicate the message properly using a clear lenguage and eassy pictures explantions. 
   I just have to mention than the rhythm was a bit slowly and there were some pictures whitout audio. 
   But despite these "mistakes" the video gets it purpose, 
   
   3. Was the video creative? 
   
   The video is not creative at all, but for explain us the evolution of farm buildings is not necessary to innovate, with a traditional presentation, like this one, the topic is ilustrated perfectly. 
   
   4. Suggestions for improvement 
   
   The only suggestion I could make is to give more rhythm and add more pictures to make the video more dinamic and enjoyable.