Farms: Casey Neistat Touts Trump Threat to Hawk Hillary & Devious DNC Scheme to Sell TRUMP!
Productivity | Information | History | View | Quality
Does Casey know Wikileaks exposed the cynical DNC scheme to elevate Trump? Elevating Trump http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/10/11/elevating-trump/ http://observer.com/2016/10/wikileaks-reveals-dnc-elevated-trump-to-help-clinton/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3828897/Hillary-Clinton-s-campaign-wanted-elevate-Donald-Trump-extreme-Republicans.html The media gave Trump MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF FREE PUBLICITY: " America’s Choice 2016 Donald Trump has earned $2 billion in free media coverage, study shows" "Donald Trump has earned close to $2 billion worth of free media attention during the 2016 campaign, eclipsing the total value of media attention given to all of his Republican competitors combined, a new study finds. The findings show that Trump earned more than six times as much free coverage as his closest competitor, Ted Cruz, and more than two-and-a-half times as much free coverage as Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side." http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/15/media/trump-free-media-coverage/ "Trump receives an unprecedented amount of media attention, and especially free television time, has been well documented in recent months. (Even Fox News is marveling at the "clear imbalance.") " http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/03/07/the-medias-not-being-honest-about-its-trump-obs/209038 "Leading newspapers–the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, LA Times and USA Today–ran three times as many Trump stories as Sanders stories: Sanders was mentioned 34 percent as often as Trump in these papers. (The Journal‘s articles are available as abstracts, not full text, on Nexis.) The New York Times had the highest ratio of Sanders to Trump mentions, at 49 percent; the Journal had the lowest, with 22 percent. All the cable news channels talked about Trump more often than Sanders–even MSNBC, which often caters to a progressive audience. MSNBC did come closest to parity of any outlet we looked at, however, with 67 percent as many Sanders as Trump stories. Fox News also had relatively frequent references to Sanders, 53 percent as many as its Trump references. CNN was the most Trump-heavy of the cable networks, mentioning Sanders only 33 percent as often. Overall, cable news referred to Sanders an average of 51 percent as often as Trump. Public broadcasting didn’t pay more attention to Sanders than did for-profit cable. On NPR, Sanders came up 39 percent as often as Trump on NPR, and 56 percent as frequently on PBS NewsHour–averaging to 48 percent. On average, the 13 outlets we surveyed had 36 percent as many references to Sanders as to Trump. While these candidates are backed by roughly as many voters in their own parties, among the general public Sanders is far more popular; in recent polls" http://fair.org/home/two-candidates-surge-in-2016-polling-but-only-trump-not-sanders-fascinates-media/ "CNN, in essence, was pumping up the indomitable image that Donald Trump wants the media to portray of him. " http://fair.org/home/press-cant-get-enough-of-trump-dumping-on-them/ https://twitter.com/latuffcartoons/status/756967854369562624 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/ How the hell am I supposed to talk about news? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGJvAB9UcD8&list=PLfrlsC1yJ2dRvSefGH5jV53jfactdG1-9
Comments
-
You look like a loony.
-
if my videos were half as awesome as these...
-
Here is the direct link to the Podesta Email on the "Pied Piper" candidates (look at attached file in link):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1120 -
vote Trump!
-
Exactly, we really shouldn't fall for Hillary's bullshit. Also, I just wrote an article explaining why voting for Jill Stein makes sense: https://medium.com/@kevinsarpei/screw-trump-and-hillary-yes-jill-stein-can-win-3a41a0dd26#.tygdatjkw
-
You're back!! I thought u were suspended
-
Maybe because he wanted to do this with the vote that in the end actually matters. Wether it is burnie sanders or Hilary I'm sure Casey would ask people to vote against trump. No one is going to vote for Jill Stein. She won't win over Hilary especially not over trump. You made this video essentially to make it all about yourself in the end.
-
I used to have great respect for your analysis and videos. Lately you have been disgusting and nasty.
-
Phillip Defranco admitted that he had received an offer of payment to endorse Hillary in his videos, he didn't elaborate on who offered the money but im betting Casey also got that offer and took it.
-
I think blaming the dnc for trump is not accurate. The republican base foams at the mouth for him. They have been conditioned for years by Fox News for this very moment.
-
this guy has reverse-horseface
-
US and Russia could 'start Third World War over Syria conflict', says Turkey
'If this proxy war continues, let me be clear, America and Russia will come to a point of war' http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/us-russia-third-world-war-syria-conflict-aleppo-turkey-deputy-prime-minister-numan-kurtulmus-a7366571.html
A no-fly zone for Aleppo risks a war that could engulf us all
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/12/no-fly-zone-aleppo-war-russia-syria -
This ass face Casey is hard to watch.
-
Jill Stein is for Black Lives Matter and 9/11 Truth...both groups you've hated for years.
-
It doesn`t matter which one you are voting for, they are all against us, also Jill Stein, if she Hillary and Trump are not the same and follow the same, than the people where not allowed 2 vote for them. A Vote is an illusion 2 manifest in your mind that you good a choise, when you give your freedom away 2 these gangsters. And by the way, Obama will never ever leave office. Martial Law, a rigged election, killing of Trump ( Illuminati Kards ) or the WW3 will let him in power :). Sorry long thext but plz. understand it`s the same in my country Germany and noone of the people ( us ) got a choise, the slavery banking system would never allow this :).
-
Stein tweeted:If we get at least 5% of the vote it makes @GreenPartyUS a new major party with public funds and ballot lines. Let's #BreakThe2PartyTrap! https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/788943277651218432
-
He did it all for the money...so why wouldn't he support Clinton
-
You do not agree with this leaked strategy - firstly, "elevating" candidates does not mean to push them as eventual Republican candidate. It can mean giving them attention that they do not deserve, to create division in the opposing camp. Secondly, even if it meant using legal means to have the opponent nominate a controversial candidate to have a better chance at winning to me, there is no scandal. It is a strategy, not an illegal one. One might disagree with it, but it is not illegal. I personally do not even think it is immoral.
-
Good point.